Joon Hong

Partner - Trial Lawyer at Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers
New York, NY17 years experience

About Joon Hong

Joon Hong is a Partner and Trial Lawyer at Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers. He specializes in medical malpractice, construction accidents, motor vehicle collisions, premises liability, products liability, and nursing home negligence cases.

Hong earned his Juris Doctor from New York Law School in 2008 and his Bachelor of Arts from University at Albany in 2000. He is admitted to practice in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York.

Korean translation is available through his profile. Before joining Claggett & Sykes, Hong practiced at a large New York-based firm. He has recovered tens of millions of dollars for clients and serves as a consultant and coach to trial attorneys nationwide. He is a descendant of Grandmaster Hwang Kee, founder of Tang Soo Do martial arts.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers

These results are credited to Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

A Utah judge entered a $951 million default judgment against Steward Health Care after newly trained nurses, an excessive Pitocin drip, and a delayed C-section at Jordan Valley Medical Center left a newborn permanently brain damaged.

Third District Court, Salt Lake City, Utah · 2025Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

A Rio Arriba County jury held Acadia Healthcare and its New Mexico foster care subsidiaries responsible for placing an 8-year-old girl with a foster father who raped her repeatedly, returning one of the largest single-plaintiff sexual abuse verdicts in the country.

Rio Arriba County (First Judicial District Court), New Mexico · 2023Sexual AbuseRead the full story →

A 20-year-old painter suffered a traumatic brain injury in a 2021 ladder fall in Utah. A Denver jury found his workers' compensation carrier, NorGUARD Insurance, knowingly and unreasonably delayed and denied his care, including inpatient rehabilitation. It awarded $145.26 million, made up of $85.26 million in compensatory and $60 million in punitive damages.

Denver District Court, Denver, Colorado · 2025Workplace InjuryRead the full story →

A retrial jury in Utah's Fourth District Court awarded $81 million against Beacon Roofing Supply after one of its trucks struck and killed a 12-year-old boy who was crossing legally in a marked crosswalk.

Fourth District Court, Utah · 2026Truck AccidentsRead the full story →
$47 millionVerdictTop 20 in Nevada · #15

A Clark County jury found Amy Geiler's losses worth just under $47 million after hospital doctors raised her dangerously low blood sodium too quickly, causing permanent brainstem damage and locked-in syndrome.

Clark County District Court, Las Vegas, NV · 2023Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

University at Albany
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of New York
State Bar of Massachusetts
State Bar of Connecticut
State Bar of U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
State Bar of U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Other attorneys at Claggett & Sykes Trial Lawyers

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other New York firms

Weitz & Luxenberg
Weitz & Luxenberg
$10.9 billion · Weitz and Luxenberg Helps Win $10.9 Billion Roundup Settlement for 125,000 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claimants
Levy Konigsberg LLP
Levy Konigsberg LLP
$43.1 Million Verdict Against R.J. Reynolds for Brake Mechanic's Lung Cancer From Menthol and Asbestos
Kramer Dillof Livingston & Moore
Kramer Dillof Livingston & Moore
$265 million · The Amtrak 188 Derailment and the $265 Million Fund for Its Victims
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP
$34 million · Jury Awards $34 Million After Prempro Hormone Therapy Causes Breast Cancer and Double Mastectomy

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.