About Julie Davis

Julie A. (Gielowski) Davis is a partner at Lubin & Meyer whose practice includes medical malpractice, products liability, professional negligence, and general liability claims. She is admitted to practice in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. She is a member of the legal team in the class-action lawsuit representing 180 patients of former Boston rheumatologist Derrick Todd, MD.

Her verdicts include a $6.8 million verdict for the family of a woman who died from cardiac complications following elective hernia surgery and a $1.6 million verdict for a man who suffered kidney failure requiring years of dialysis due to contrast administered during a CT scan. Selected to Boston magazine's Top Lawyers list in medical malpractice in 2022 and 2023, she has also been listed as a Top Rated Medical Malpractice Attorney by Super Lawyers Rising Stars since 2019. She received her B.A. magna cum laude from American University in 2011 and her J.D. from Boston College Law School in 2014.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Lubin & Meyer

These results are credited to Lubin & Meyer. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

A Middlesex County jury returned the largest personal-injury verdict in Massachusetts history after finding that an obstetrician waited more than five hours to perform an emergency C-section despite clear signs of fetal distress, causing a Dracut boy to develop cerebral palsy.

Middlesex County Superior Court, Lowell MA · 2005Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

A Norfolk Superior Court jury awarded Andrea Larkin $35.4 million after finding that Dedham Medical Associates failed to document a known brain abnormality, leaving her obstetrician unaware of a condition that made vaginal delivery dangerous.

Norfolk Superior Court, Dedham MA · 2015Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

An Essex Superior Court jury awarded $29 million to the two daughters of Joseph Brown, 43, after Salem Hospital emergency physicians failed to order a CT scan that would have revealed a fatal aortic aneurysm and dissection in time for lifesaving surgery.

Essex Superior Court, Newburyport MA · 2023Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

A Middlesex Superior Court jury awarded Steven Luppold $20 million after Lowell General Hospital emergency staff misdiagnosed a leg blood clot as sciatica on two separate visits, delaying treatment until amputation was unavoidable.

Middlesex Superior Court, Lowell MA · 2023Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →
$16.7 millionVerdict

A Suffolk Superior Court jury awarded $16.7 million after a Brigham and Women's Hospital radiologist read a 2006 chest X-ray as normal, missing a visible lung nodule that would develop into terminal cancer within 13 months.

Suffolk Superior Court, Boston MA · 2014Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Boston College Law School
J.D., 2014
American University
Undergraduate, 2011

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Massachusetts
State Bar of Rhode Island

Other attorneys at Lubin & Meyer

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Boston firms

Swartz & Swartz
Swartz & Swartz
$18.4 million · Federal Jury Awards $18.4 Million After Lahey Clinic Doctors Cancel HIV Test, Allowing AIDS to Develop
Sugarman & Sugarman
Sugarman & Sugarman
$30.55 Million Verdict After Traveling Nurse Failed to Monitor Fetal Heart Rate at MGH
Sweeney Merrigan Personal Injury Lawyers
Sweeney Merrigan Personal Injury Lawyers
$450 million sought · $450 Million Wrongful Death Suit: Eversource Ignored Gas Leak for Three Years Before Fatal Maynard Explosion
Breakstone, White & Gluck
Breakstone, White & Gluck
$56 million · Middlesex Jury Awards $56 Million to Retiree Disabled When Amazon Delivery Van Crossed the Center Line
Thornton Law Firm
Thornton Law Firm
$42.6 million · Massachusetts Jury Returns $42.6 Million Verdict Against J&J in Baby Powder Mesothelioma Case

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.