Similar personal injury attorneys in Philadelphia
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Brian Hall
Brian C. Hall is a partner at the firm with nearly three decades of experience representing accident victims in personal injury litigation across Pennsylvania and New Jersey courts. He earned his undergraduate degree from Rutgers University, a master's degree from Columbia University, and his law degree from Temple University School of Law, where he wrote for the law journal and received awards for outstanding performance in Jurisprudence and Trial Advocacy. His practice concentrates on medical malpractice, defective products, institutional abuse, and catastrophic injury, including cases involving failure to diagnose cancer and heart attacks, birth injuries, nursing home neglect, and stroke care. Representative results include a $15 million kidney damage verdict in a pediatric infection case, an $11.2 million brain tumor misdiagnosis verdict, a $7.5 million settlement for the death of an unborn child, and a $2 million small bowel obstruction settlement. He has been selected to Pennsylvania Super Lawyers.
Proven verdicts and settlements at Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry, P.C.
These results are credited to Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry, P.C.. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.
A Philadelphia jury awarded roughly $976.5 million, including $800 million in punitive damages, after the rip-stitch seat belt in Francis Amagasu's 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT tore during a rollover and left him quadriplegic. Daniel Sherry Jr., Nancy Winkler, and Jessica Colliver tried the case for the firm then known as Eisenberg, Rothweiler, Winkler, Eisenberg & Jeck, with co-counsel Kyle Farrar and Wes Ball of Houston's Kaster Lynch Farrar & Ball. On December 22, 2025 the Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated the judgment, which had grown to over $1 billion with delay damages, and ordered a new trial over the jury instructions. The retrial had not yet taken place as of this writing.
A Philadelphia jury found that a defectively designed seat belt in a 1999 Acura Integra left driver Carlos Martinez a quadriplegic after a rollover on Interstate 70 near Baltimore, and awarded him and his wife $55,325,714. Stewart J. Eisenberg and Daniel J. Sherry Jr., then of Eisenberg, Rothweiler, Winkler, Eisenberg & Jeck (now Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry), tried the case against Honda. The trial court denied Honda's post-trial motions and entered judgment on the full verdict plus $2,066,002 in delay damages, a molded judgment of $57,391,716. Honda appealed, arguing that a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision handed down while its post-trial motion was pending had rewritten the state's products liability standard. On April 19, 2017, the Pennsylvania Superior Court rejected every argument Honda raised and affirmed.
A Philadelphia jury awarded $24.8 million to Sean Kalinowski, a roofer who suffered a traumatic brain injury and partial blindness after falling more than 20 feet through an unguarded skylight at an Aston, Pennsylvania auto body shop in June 2016. The jury found the tenant, ABRA Auto Body & Glass, 60 percent at fault, the building's owner, 2626 Market LLC, 30 percent at fault, and Kalinowski 10 percent contributorily negligent. A post-trial order applying Pennsylvania's joint and several liability rule and a pre-verdict high-low agreement directed ABRA to pay $19.36 million and 2626 Market to pay $3 million, a combined $22.36 million. ABRA's carrier paid only part of that amount and the defendants filed an appeal despite having waived that right, and no public record confirms how the dispute was finally resolved.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Bar admissions & credentials
Other attorneys at Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry, P.C.
View firm →Proven verdicts and settlements from other Philadelphia firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.









