About Daniel Sherry

Daniel J. Sherry Jr. is a shareholder at the firm with over 20 years of experience in product liability, automobile defects, construction accidents, and commercial vehicle and trucking litigation. He earned his undergraduate degree in Political Science from Lafayette College in 2002, where he captained the men's swim team, and his J.D. from Villanova University School of Law in 2005, where he chaired the Health Law Society. He is admitted in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and before the U.S. Supreme Court and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. His results include a $101 million Tropicana Atlantic City parking garage collapse settlement

  • a $65 million dram shop settlement
  • a $55.3 million crashworthiness verdict arising from a 1999 Acura Integra rollover
  • a $36.5 million defective tire settlement
  • and a $35 million defective tire settlement

He is a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer, listed in Best Lawyers, and serves as a member of the American Association for Justice Board of Directors.

Proven verdicts and settlements

$976.5 millionVerdict

A Philadelphia jury awarded roughly $976.5 million, including $800 million in punitive damages, after the rip-stitch seat belt in Francis Amagasu's 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT tore during a rollover and left him quadriplegic. Daniel Sherry Jr., Nancy Winkler, and Jessica Colliver tried the case for the firm then known as Eisenberg, Rothweiler, Winkler, Eisenberg & Jeck, with co-counsel Kyle Farrar and Wes Ball of Houston's Kaster Lynch Farrar & Ball. On December 22, 2025 the Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated the judgment, which had grown to over $1 billion with delay damages, and ordered a new trial over the jury instructions. The retrial had not yet taken place as of this writing.

Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Pennsylvania · 2023Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$55.33 millionVerdictTop 20 of 2014 · #9

A Philadelphia jury found that a defectively designed seat belt in a 1999 Acura Integra left driver Carlos Martinez a quadriplegic after a rollover on Interstate 70 near Baltimore, and awarded him and his wife $55,325,714. Stewart J. Eisenberg and Daniel J. Sherry Jr., then of Eisenberg, Rothweiler, Winkler, Eisenberg & Jeck (now Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry), tried the case against Honda. The trial court denied Honda's post-trial motions and entered judgment on the full verdict plus $2,066,002 in delay damages, a molded judgment of $57,391,716. Honda appealed, arguing that a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision handed down while its post-trial motion was pending had rewritten the state's products liability standard. On April 19, 2017, the Pennsylvania Superior Court rejected every argument Honda raised and affirmed.

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Pennsylvania (affirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court) · 2014Product LiabilityRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Villanova University School of Law
J.D., 2005
Lafayette College
Undergraduate, 2002

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Pennsylvania
State Bar of New Jersey

Other attorneys at Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry, P.C.

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Philadelphia firms

Kline & Specter, PC
Kline & Specter, PC
$4.85 Billion Vioxx MDL Settlement for Heart-Attack and Stroke Victims
Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky
Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky
$1.02 billion · Champlain Towers Collapse: $1.021 Billion for 98 Victims in Under a Year
Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock Dodig
Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock Dodig
$160 million · U-Haul Pays $160 Million After Overfilled Propane Tank Kills Food Truck Owner and Her Daughter
Ross Feller Casey
Ross Feller Casey
$85 Million Verdict for Penn Med Student Who Fell 18 Feet Into Open Center City Manhole
Anapol Weiss
Anapol Weiss
$1.6 billion · 104 Women Win $1.6 Billion Against Long Island Pediatrician Stuart Copperman

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.