About Joshua Harris

Joshua Harris is a Partner and Director of Mass Tort Litigation at Gomez Trial Attorneys. After spending several years at one of the nation's most prominent mass tort firms (Levin Papantonio), Josh joined Gomez Trial Attorneys to expand the types of cases the firm handles. His practice focuses on mass torts including defective products, pharmaceutical injuries, and environmental harms.

He was a member of the national opiate litigation team, working on cases against major distributor defendants and participating in a bellwether trial that resulted in a $21 billion national settlement. A Florida native, Josh attended the University of Florida and Stetson University College of Law, where he was a member of the college's #1 nationally ranked trial team. After graduating, he worked for three years as a public defender and served as lead counsel in over thirty trials, most of which were jury trials.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Gomez Trial Attorneys

These results are credited to Gomez Trial Attorneys. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

$25.9 millionVerdict

A San Diego jury found Robert O. Young, author of the best-selling book "The pH Miracle," liable for $105 million after he treated Dawn Kali's breast cancer with baking soda infusions and told her to skip conventional care, an award a judge later cut to about $25.9 million.

San Diego County Superior Court, San Diego, CA · 2018Medical MalpracticeRead the full story →
$16.2 millionVerdict

A Kern County jury awarded William Kidd and his wife Elaine $16.2 million after he slipped at a Bakersfield El Pollo Loco and suffered a brain injury that later required surgery.

Kern County Superior Court, Bakersfield, CA · 2018Slip & FallRead the full story →
$14.5 millionVerdictTop 10 of 2006 · #7

A San Diego jury held former county toxicologist Kristin Rossum and San Diego County responsible for the 2000 fentanyl killing of Greg de Villers, awarding his family $106 million in a wrongful death case tried by John Gomez.

San Diego County Superior Court, San Diego, CA · 2006Wrongful DeathRead the full story →
$10.8 millionVerdictTop 20 of 2010 · #20

A San Diego jury returned a $10.8 million verdict against Pizza Hut after one of its delivery drivers drifted across a center divide and hit a mother and daughter head-on, leaving the daughter with a permanent brain injury.

San Diego County Superior Court, San Diego, CA · 2010Car AccidentsRead the full story →
$8.5 millionVerdict

A San Diego County jury found the Metropolitan Transit System 40 percent at fault for the death of Anthony McGaff, who was held in a chokehold for more than eight minutes aboard a moving city bus.

San Diego County Superior Court, San Diego, CA · 2025Wrongful DeathRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Stetson University College of Law
J.D.
University of Florida
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Florida

Awards & recognition

National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40
Super Lawyers Florida Rising Star
Member of Stetson Law's #1 nationally ranked trial team

Other attorneys at Gomez Trial Attorneys

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other San Diego firms

CaseyGerry
CaseyGerry
$393.5 million · Wells Fargo Pays $393.5 Million to Resolve Forced Auto Insurance Scheme
Estey & Bomberger
Estey & Bomberger
$100 Million Settlement Ends Ohio State's Strauss Abuse Litigation, Covering Nearly 280 Survivors
Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire
Thorsnes Bartolotta McGuire
$94.5 million · San Diego Developer Wins $94.5 Million Jury Verdict Over City's Broken Promises at Otay Mesa
Frantz Law Group
Frantz Law Group
$13.5 billion · PG&E Wildfire Bankruptcy: $13.5 Billion Settlement for Northern California Fire Victims
Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.
Harris Personal Injury Lawyers, Inc.
$21.5 Million Settlement After Exposed Trolley Rail Left Man Paralyzed at San Diego Transit Station

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.