About Thomas A. Rottinghaus

Tom has represented counties, cities, and other government entities in litigation stemming from the nationwide prescription opioid epidemic Currently pursuing claims on behalf of individuals against the makers of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists weight loss drugs Tom Rottinghaus has practiced civil litigation in Kansas City for 22 years. For the first 15 years of his career, Tom’s practice primarily focused on the representation of one of the nation's largest hospital systems, representing hospitals and health care providers in professional negligence cases and commercial litigation. More recently, Tom’s practice has expanded to include representation of individuals, businesses, and local governments in mass actions pending in courts across the United States. Tom is currently involved in the representation of several businesses in litigation against a large insurance company alleging improper denial of claims relating to COVID-19.

Recently, Tom was involved with a team of lawyers pursuing plaintiffs’ claims through fact discovery against a drug distributor in cases pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804. Tom is also working with a leadership team in the prosecution of nationwide claims against a leading manufacturer of vena cava filters in California. In re: Cordis IVC Filter Cases, JCCP 4977 (Alameda County, Ca.).

Tom and his firm have also been involved in the prosecution and administration of thousands of product liability claims against several pelvic mesh manufacturers throughout the country in recent years. Tom has tried cases in various state and federal courts across the country. He has been consistently recognized by his peers in legal publications as one of the top attorneys in Missouri and Kansas for his litigation work over the last 10 years.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Wagstaff & Cartmell

These results are credited to Wagstaff & Cartmell. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

San Francisco Unified School District's case was the first JUUL bellwether trial against Altria; after the plaintiffs rested, Altria agreed to pay $235 million to resolve roughly 6,000 pending e-vapor claims nationwide.

U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (MDL No. 2913) · 2023Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$20 millionVerdictTop 20 in Indiana · #12

A federal jury in Hammond, Indiana found that Ethicon's Prolift transvaginal mesh was defectively designed and inadequately warned against, awarding Barbara and Anton Kaiser $35 million. A judge reduced the punitive damages, leaving a $20 million verdict that the Seventh Circuit affirmed in full in 2020.

U.S. District Court, N.D. Indiana, No. 2:17-cv-114 · 2018Product LiabilityRead the full story →

Kathryn Gant died at the scene of a head-on crash on K-58 in Kansas on June 10, 2011, after a driver crossed the center line in a no-passing zone. Her husband sued the driver, the driver's parents and the family oil company. After a five-day bench trial in June 2015, a Coffey County judge found all of them liable and awarded $6,723,021. Under a pretrial agreement, none of the judgment could be collected from the defendants themselves.

Coffey County District Court, Kansas · 2015Wrongful DeathRead the full story →
$6 millionVerdict

A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google's YouTube negligent in designing platforms that harmed a young woman identified as K.G.M., who began watching YouTube at age 6 and joined Instagram at 9. On March 25, 2026, it awarded $3 million in compensatory damages, split 70 percent to Meta and 30 percent to YouTube, plus $3 million in punitive damages. It was the first bellwether trial in the coordinated California social media addiction cases.

Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County (JCCP 5255, Judge Carolyn Kuhl) · 2026Product LiabilityRead the full story →
$5.7 millionVerdict

A Kern County jury handed Coleen Perry a $5.7 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon unit on March 5, 2015, in the first trial ever to reach a jury over Ethicon's TVT-Abbrevo polypropylene mesh sling.

Superior Court of California, Kern County · 2015Product LiabilityRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

University of Kansas School of Law
J.D., 1998
University of Kansas
Undergraduate, 1995

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Kansas
State Bar of Missouri

Other attorneys at Wagstaff & Cartmell

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Kansas City firms

Dollar, Burns, Becker & Hershewe
Dollar, Burns, Becker & Hershewe
$82.3 Million Verdict for I-70 Crash Victim Struck by Trucker Watching Videos on iPad
The Popham Law Firm
The Popham Law Firm
$57 Million Settlement for 1,700 Sprint Workers in Landmark ADEA Collective Action
Brown & Crouppen
Brown & Crouppen
$119.5 million · $462 Million Verdict After Fatal Underride Crash Killed Two Young Fathers
Shamberg Johnson & Bergman
Shamberg Johnson & Bergman
$15.28 million · $23.5 Million Verdict Against Swift Transportation for Meth-Impaired Driver
Cullan & Cullan LLC
Cullan & Cullan LLC
$20.82 million · $25.4 Million Verdict for Birth Injury From Excessive Pitocin

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.