Similar personal injury attorneys in Roseland
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
About Bradley Rice
Bradley L. Rice is a partner at Nagel Rice LLP concentrating on business and commercial litigation, class actions, personal injury, medical malpractice, and employment litigation. He has experience in federal and state courts, as well as AAA and FINRA proceedings, representing companies and individuals in complex commercial and securities matters nationwide. Before joining Nagel Rice, he was an associate at O'Melveny and Myers LLP. He interned for the Honorable Kenneth Levy of the NJ Superior Court and served as Research Editor of the Rutgers Law Review. Notable representations include the MZL Capital Holdings v. TD Bank matter in the Third Circuit, an $800,000 settlement in an employment discrimination case against William Paterson University, and a confidential settlement in a child sexual abuse case against the Boy Scouts of America involving three victims following a four-day trial.
Proven verdicts and settlements
A New Jersey jury awarded $6,000,000 after finding that a colorectal surgeon's failure to remove a polyp let a patient's colon cancer go undetected until it had spread to his liver. Benjamin Serico died of the cancer while the case was pending, and his wife Lucia Serico carried it to trial as executrix of his estate. While the jury was deliberating, the parties struck a high-low agreement that guaranteed the family a minimum recovery and capped the surgeon's total exposure at $1,000,000. Because the verdict exceeded that ceiling, judgment entered at $1,000,000. Both the New Jersey Appellate Division and the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the agreement controlled and that no attorney's fees could be added on top of it.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.
Practice areas
Education
Other attorneys at Nagel Rice, LLP
View firm →
Proven verdicts and settlements from other Roseland firms
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.