Richard Rose

Attorney/Shareholder at The Wilhite Law Firm
Denver, CO47 years experienceAdmitted 1978

About Richard Rose

Richard Rose is Vice-President and Attorney/Shareholder at The Wilhite Law Firm in Colorado. He has practiced personal injury litigation since joining the firm in 1979 and dedicates 75% of his practice to litigation.

Early in his career, he served as a law clerk to Denver District Court Judge Robert P. Fullerton.

His legal work appears in 15 published Colorado and Federal appellate decisions, including Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Baca (682 P.2d 11, Colo. 1984) and Patterson v. Cronin (650 P.2d 531, Colo. 1982).

Rose earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Denver College of Law in 1978 and his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University of Denver in 1974, where he was a member of the National Social Science Honor Society.

He is admitted to the Colorado Bar (1978), U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado (1978), and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1978).

He is a member of the Colorado Bar Association, Denver Bar Association, Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, American Board of Trial Advocates, and was a member of the National Association of Retail Collection Attorneys (1993-2005) and American Bankruptcy Institute (1999-2005).

His recognitions include AV Preeminent rating, Best Lawyers, Super Lawyer status, and Million Dollar Advocate designation.

Proven verdicts and settlements at The Wilhite Law Firm

These results are credited to The Wilhite Law Firm. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

$4.51 millionVerdictTop 20 in Colorado · #19

A Boulder jury awarded $5.3 million to a man who fractured his spine after falling from an unsteady ladder when the homeowner walked away without warning.

Boulder District Court · 2024Premises LiabilityRead the full story →
$387,000

A University of Colorado basketball player was struck from behind in a Denver alley by a police patrol car and dragged beneath it when the officer reversed. After a four-day trial, a Denver jury found the officer 90% at fault and awarded $579,795.65 in damages. The Colorado Governmental Immunity Act cap, which includes costs and interest, limited the judgment to $387,000, and the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed in May 2025. The Colorado Supreme Court denied review that September.

Denver District Court, Colorado · 2022Car AccidentsRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

University of Denver
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Colorado, admitted 1978
State Bar of U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, admitted 1978
State Bar of U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, admitted 1978
Colorado Bar Association
Denver Bar Association
Colorado Trial Lawyers Association
American Board of Trial Advocates

Awards & recognition

AV Preeminent rating
Best Lawyers
Super Lawyer
Million Dollar Advocate

Other attorneys at The Wilhite Law Firm

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Denver firms

Leventhal Puga Braley
Leventhal Puga Braley
$67.35 Million Colorado Record for Infant Brain-Damaged When Surgeon Tied Off Aorta in Heart Surgery
Bachus & Schanker, Personal Injury Lawyers
Bachus & Schanker, Personal Injury Lawyers
$27.6 Million Verdict for Newborn Whose E. Coli Sepsis Went Untreated at North Colorado Medical Center
Zaner Law Personal Injury and Car Accident Attorneys
Zaner Law Personal Injury and Car Accident Attorneys
$16 Million Verdict for Electrocuted Flooring Worker, Colorado's Largest Premises Liability Award
Chod Law, LLC
Chod Law, LLC
$9.3 million · Jury Awards Lincoln Railcar Repairer $9.3 Million After BNSF Crane Accident Left Him With Spine Injuries
Dormer Harpring Denver Personal Injury Lawyers
Dormer Harpring Denver Personal Injury Lawyers
$4 million · Federal Jury Awards $4 Million After Saguache County Jail Staff Ignored Inmate's Suicidal Warnings

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.