About Bethany Dow

Bethany Dow is a partner at Hamilton Wingo who focuses on personal injury and wrongful death litigation, including automobile and 18-wheeler crashes, catastrophic trucking accidents, dangerous premises and construction sites, and dram shop liability. Before joining the firm she worked as a defense attorney representing insurance companies, trucking firms, and businesses in high-stakes litigation, and she now applies that inside knowledge of defense strategy on behalf of injured plaintiffs. She is licensed to practice in Texas state courts, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Dow earned her J.D. from Pepperdine University School of Law, where she also received a Certificate of Dispute Resolution from the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, and a B.B.A. summa cum laude from the University of Texas at Austin.

Proven verdicts and settlements at Hamilton Wingo, LLP

These results are credited to Hamilton Wingo, LLP. A result appears under an attorney's own name only when a published source names them as counsel on the case.

A Dallas jury found Charter Communications liable for the December 2019 murder of 83-year-old customer Betty Jo McClain Thomas by Roy Holden Jr., a Spectrum field technician who had serviced her home the day before, and for forging her signature on an arbitration agreement after her death. The jury awarded $375 million in actual damages and $7 billion in punitive damages. The family then remitted the punitive award down to twice the compensatory damages, in line with the due-process ratio limits the U.S. Supreme Court set in State Farm v. Campbell, and the trial court entered judgment for $1.147 billion. The family later agreed to a further remittitur to $262 million rather than keep defending the larger figure on appeal. Charter then settled confidentially for less than that, funded by its liability insurance, while its appeal to the Fifth Court of Appeals was still pending, and the appeal was dismissed at Charter's own request.

County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas · 2022Wrongful DeathRead the full story →
$6 millionVerdict

A Tarrant County jury found Walmart 80 percent at fault, including gross negligence, after a Walmart employee backed a customer's vehicle into Carl Chojnicki at a Walmart Auto Care Center in North Richland Hills, Texas, breaking his femur. On April 25, 2024, the jury awarded him $6 million: $1.482 million in compensatory damages and $4.518 million in exemplary damages. Walmart appealed, and while the appeal was pending the parties settled; the Fort Worth Court of Appeals set aside the trial court's judgment by agreement in October 2024, so no public dollar figure from the case legally stands today.

67th District Court, Tarrant County, Texas (Fort Worth); appealed to the Second Court of Appeals of Texas · 2024Premises LiabilityRead the full story →

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.

Practice areas

Education

Pepperdine University School of Law
J.D.
The University of Texas at Austin
Undergraduate

Bar admissions & credentials

State Bar of Texas

Other attorneys at Hamilton Wingo, LLP

View firm →

Proven verdicts and settlements from other Dallas firms

Aldous Law
Aldous Law
$268.6 million · Jury Awards $268 Million After Medical City Gave a 13-Year-Old Girl a Fatal Propofol Overdose
Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP
Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP
$966 Million Talc Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson for a Mesothelioma Death, Punitive Award Vacated
Turley Law Firm
Turley Law Firm
$119.6 million · Dallas Jury Awards $119.6 Million Against Catholic Diocese for Decades of Clergy Abuse and Cover-Up
Loncar Lyon Jenkins
Loncar Lyon Jenkins
$296 Million Verdict Against Koch Industries for Butane Pipeline Deaths in Kaufman County
Lyons & Simmons, LLP
Lyons & Simmons, LLP
$360.01 million · $860 Million Verdict in Dallas Crane Collapse Death, Entered as $360 Million Judgment After Exemplary Cap

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is unique and depends on its own facts.